A
the latte, and that a reference to Leciting, Sir E.B. Lytton's Despateles Nr 18 of 11th Odibor 1858 attè 32 of 2!! April 1867 will
show this.
11.
One
M. Jouh
point to be noticed is that seems never to consider himself responsible for the worsting of his Departinent, Does
query or a request for ueplanation come from the Auditor General or the Colonial, Secretary, M. Forch prases it on by
endorsenient to one
of his subordinates, as in the Minute of 6th January 1865 quoted by the Commission as "remantable", and even the transactions of the Preasury business with the Summary Jurisdidim Court is
Ʌ n
A
great measure thrust by M. Forh
the Colonial Secretary, as will be seen
34
from the constant reference of correspenveence. While I shinst that the Commission
12.
ar
e justified sin their remonts
gennally, en the Colonial Treasurer, there is one front av which I would obsewe, and this is that the Colonial Treasurer avas not responsible
for the late appearance of Netifications of Valuation and Assessment as this lay
the Valuates whose last is un
A.
difficult
but
with
under
doubtedly
even with the collection
no
commencing in February there is me reased why the first quarter's rates should not be collected before the one of the quarter.
13.
With respect to the Court of dummary Jurisdiction there is no doubt that when Mr. Fouch found himself in difficully min
itre
arreous he adopted. the scopedient of
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.